Avoid C library functions not guaranteed to be thread-safe

[Olly Betts]

Currently we use environmental variables to control a few things (default backend for a newly created DB, flush threshold, replication stuff, cjk ngram, debug logging) but getenv() isn't necessarily thread safe.

Adding a mutex which we lock while calling it wouldn't help as it isn't Xapian potentially calling setenv()/putenv().

In general we'll be unlucky to hit problems, as we don't call getenv() very often, but that's not very reassuring.

I don't see a good fix, aside from not reading environmental variables. Debug logging is a special case, but aside from that I think we should probably try to phase them out - being able to change the default backend without changing the code is kind of nice, but otherwise these things would arguably be better specified in the code.

[Olly Betts]

I think we should broaden this to cover any library functions which aren't necessarily thread-safe.

According to the Linux man pages, there are potential issues with atoi() (and related functions like atol(), strtoul(), etc which we don't currently use in the library code):

These functions can be safely used in multithreaded applications, as long as setlocale(3) is not called to change the locale during their execution.

I can't see anything in POSIX about this potential issue, so not sure if Linux is failing to conform here. It's not likely to bite in practice, but perhaps we should aim to avoid these functions in the library code.

We use inet_ntoa() (which isn't thread-safe as it has a static return buffer) in one place, to report where the connection is from in net/tcpserver.cc. That'll change when IPv6 support is added.

I'm thinking we should see if we can compile a list of library functions to avoid, and blacklist them somehow (perhaps a header which does #define inet_ntoa DO_NOT_USE_inet_ntoa which gets included in all library code sources).

[Olly Betts]

GCC supports "poisoning" identifiers, e.g. #pragma GCC poison inet_ntoa:

​https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.0/cpp/Pragmas.html

Less portable, but perhaps less likely to cause issues - if a bad function is used as a method name or a variable, the pragma will at worst prevent compilation, whereas the #define approach could, for example, break the ABI of the built library.

[Olly Betts]

Functions which POSIX says are not required to be thread-safe which we're actually using in the library code in current master:

• getenv() - used to read things like XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD.
• inet_ntoa() - used in the remote server code - while that's in the library, it's only actually used in binaries we build currently.
• readdir() - used in replication code to delete the old replica - again, in the library but only used in binaries we build

And strerror() is used, but only if neither strerror_r() nor sys_errlist are available.

There's also at least atoi() and strtod() which the Linux man pages note aren't thread-safe if another thread calls setlocale() while they are executing.

[Olly Betts]

[ada3bd5f12a444d778d57c0c75cccacc077d5051] updates master to use inet_ntop() instead of inet_ntoa().

[Olly Betts]

POSIX requires that readdir() be thread-safe if the DIR* pointer is only used in a single thread, which is how we always use it:

The returned pointer, and pointers within the structure, might be invalidated or the structure or the storage areas might be overwritten by a subsequent call to readdir() on the same directory stream. They shall not be affected by a call to readdir() on a different directory stream.

(my emphasis)

​http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/readdir.html

[Olly Betts]

So the list is now:

• getenv() - used to read things like XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD.
• strerror() (but only if there's no thread-safe alternative).
• atoi() - quite a few uses.
• strtod() - only use is in NumberValueRangeProcessor::operator() - also means that behaviour depends on the locale, which is probably not always desirable.

We should have a section in the developer docs about this too.

None of this directly affects the ABI, though eliminating uses of getenv() might need some API additions. I don't think this should block 1.4.0 though.

[Olly Betts]

[60bd2fb4e2a559c214f3569d1f5f64f85ba1766f] replaced 17 uses of atoi(). That leaves just 6 in libxapian.

[Olly Betts]

c31aa9b56eb858c9acce410d5465e91007d997b4 removes 2 more uses of atoi() from libxapian.

[Olly Betts]

Current status:

• getenv() - used to read things like XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD.
• strerror() (but only if there's no thread-safe alternative).
• atoi() - api/valuerangeproc.cc (DateRangeProcessor), backends/databasehelpers.h (parsing port number in remote stub lines),
• strtod() - weight/weightinternal.h parsing double parameters, api/valuerangeproc.cc NumberRangeProcessor::operator() - also means that behaviour depends on the locale, which is probably not always desirable.
• strtol() - weight/lmweight.cc

And as noted before, we should have a section in the developer docs about this too. Also maybe poison some of these to stop them being reintroduced (at least strtol() seems to have appeared since I last checked). Not sure how easy that is to do just for the library, and we don't need to worry about these in the tools, examples, or testsuite.

[James Aylett]

Can we do the poisoning in config.h so it only applies during library compilation? We could then put bless blocks around any uses we want to whitelist, such as in examples and tools. (Clang seems to support GCC poison pragmas, but looks like it doesn't handle blessing. However we could enable this for GCC only, because we really just want CI to fail somewhere. Doesn't have to fail everywhere.)

[Olly Betts]

I hadn't considered we could unpoison things - that might work.

Another option that might work is to have a #ifdef XAPIAN_NO_POISON or similar around them in config.h, and just define that before #include <config.h> where we want to whitelist.

I agree we only need to catch this in CI, but it's more helpful to people submitting patches and using clang to have this flagged during early development rather than only after they've submitted a patch.

[Olly Betts]

Actually it seems we can't do this in <config.h> because that should be included before any other headers, and:

$ cat poison.cc 
#pragma GCC poison atoi
#include <stdlib.h>
$ g++ -Wall -W -O2 -c poison.cc 
In file included from /usr/include/c++/9/cstdlib:75,
                 from /usr/include/c++/9/stdlib.h:36,
                 from poison.cc:2:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:104:12: error: attempt to use poisoned "atoi"
  104 | extern int atoi (const char *__nptr)
      |            ^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/9/cstdlib:75,
                 from /usr/include/c++/9/stdlib.h:36,
                 from poison.cc:2:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:361:8: error: attempt to use poisoned "atoi"
  361 | __NTH (atoi (const char *__nptr))
      |        ^
In file included from /usr/include/c++/9/stdlib.h:36,
                 from poison.cc:2:
/usr/include/c++/9/cstdlib:91:8: error: attempt to use poisoned "atoi"
   91 | #undef atoi
      |        ^
/usr/include/c++/9/cstdlib:141:11: error: attempt to use poisoned "atoi"
  141 |   using ::atoi;
      |           ^
In file included from poison.cc:2:
/usr/include/c++/9/stdlib.h:56:12: error: attempt to use poisoned "atoi"
   56 | using std::atoi;
      |            ^

So we'd have to poison after we include headers which might reference the identifier - we can't poison atoi and then #include <stdlib.h>, nor any header which might indirectly #include <stdlib.h>.

Perhaps this is better checked by xapian-check-patch - we can easily control which directories that applies a check to.

[Olly Betts]

Does GCC actually support a bless pragma? With GCC 9.2.1 I get:

poison.cc:2: warning: ignoring #pragma GCC bless [-Wunknown-pragmas]
    2 | #pragma GCC bless atoi

The only references I found seem to be copies of a blog post wishing it existed.

[James Aylett]

Yeah, I didn't read the blog post closely enough in the first place. Having something in xapian-check-patch seems a good plan, and at least the ones we are avoiding at the moment are symbols that won't be used elsewhere (except possibly in comments, which we could cater for).

[James Aylett]

We could also define the symbols to something else and get a link error which would be un-poisonable, but it's not going to be as clear an error as we can manage in xapian-check-patch.

[Olly Betts]

xapian-check-patch already strips comment content so that shouldn't be an issue.

I think the #define inet_ntoa DO_NOT_USE_inet_ntoa approach would (like the poison pragma) require something like #include "poison.h" to be included after any other header in every source which is part of the library. But that's easy to fail to do (and easy for someone to merge that include into a block of others thinking it's out of place or add an include after it which might work on one platform but fail on another depending which system headers implicitly include others), so we'd really need xapian-check-patch to check it's suitably included where it should be. Probably simpler to just check for a list of bad functions in xapian-check-patch.

Another benefit of checking from a script is we can be a little more nuanced - e.g. strerror() is used in the library, but only as a fallback option if we don't have strerror_r() or sys_errlist or similar - with a script we can allow the use in common/errno_to_string.cc.

Also the poison pragma is based only on identifiers, so e.g. would complain about a class with an atoi() method. I'm not sure if any of the identifiers we would want to poison would be likely method names though.

[Olly Betts]

I've now eliminated all uses of atoi() and strtol() in the library itself.

Current status:

• getenv() - used to read things like XAPIAN_FLUSH_THRESHOLD.
• strerror() (but only if there's no thread-safe alternative).
• strtod() - weight/weightinternal.h parsing double parameters, api/valuerangeproc.cc NumberRangeProcessor::operator() - also means that behaviour depends on the locale, which is probably not always desirable. C++17 provides ​std::from_chars() which we could use if available. Do we want to provide a way to allow , as decimal point though?

Also to do:

• Add section to the developer docs about this
• Add checks to xapian-check-patch to prevent more calls to problematic functions from being introduced into the library code

[Olly Betts]

I think we should aim to address this for 1.5.0 (or 1.5.x at least), at least for mainstream platforms (for example, the requirements might be an alternative to strerror() and a C++17 compiler).

[Olly Betts]

​https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support seems to suggest that no compiler supports std::from_chars() for FP types yet, and looking at /usr/include/c++/9/charconv from GCC 9 seems to confirm that, so that's no help.

We could write our own or find an existing implementation, but I think it's quite subtle to get completely right.

[Olly Betts]

That page now suggests that GCC11 and a recent MSVC version support std::from_chars() for floating point types (search for "Elementary string conversions" to find the relevant entry) so probably using this if available is the best option overall, and will get better with time.

[Olly Betts]

OK, let's use std::from_chars() where it supports double and postpone the rest. With a suitable platform and toolchain that means only getenv() is a concern (and it seems perhaps it's fine on many platforms, it's just that POSIX allows it to return its value in a static buffer; or possibly concurrent setenv() might be problematic too?)