#323 closed defect (fixed)
Can not build xapian-bindings for ruby 1.9
Reported by: | cheba | Owned by: | Olly Betts |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.0.11 |
Component: | Xapian-bindings | Version: | 1.0.10 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: | Operating System: | All |
Description (last modified by )
First, ruby 1.9 has special key in rbconfig for headers dir. It's called rubyhdrdir.
Second, for some reason config.h can not be found.
Attachments (5)
Change History (21)
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | xapian-bindings-1.0.10-ruby-1.9-hdrdir-2.patch added |
---|
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Component: | Build system → Xapian-bindings |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 1.0.11 |
Status: | new → assigned |
Version: | → 1.0.10 |
I assume from the patch filename this was with 1.0.10 - if not please correct the version I've set.
I went for combining the two into a single command since otherwise I get "nil" for Ruby 1.8 (and this also avoids the overhead of running Ruby a second time for Ruby < 1.9):
[RUBY_INC=`$RUBY -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["rubyhdrdir"] || Config::CONFIG["archdir"]'`]
Also, interestingly ruby1.9 on Debian etch doesn't have rubyhdrdir. I guess it is probably a snapshot and this was added later on.
I've no idea about your config.h issue. You're going to give some details. Tell us what you did and what the result was (and what you expected to happen instead if that's not completely obvious).
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
Yes, this is for xapian-bindings 1.0.10.
I use Ruby 1.9.1 RC1. Distro is Gentoo. Ruby has a few patches applied but those are for ruby gems. I can provide you build options for ruby if you need. Please, tell what exactly can be useful.
comment:3 by , 16 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
The commands you typed to build and their output. Probably just for xapian-bindings to start with. If there's a lot of output, it's probably better to include it all (log it to a file and attach it to this ticket) rather than risk trimming out something relevant.
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
xapian-bindings 1.0.10 Applied your patch for rubyhdrdir.
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --without-python --without-php --without-tcl --without-csharp --without-java --with-ruby --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
It looks like we also now need a -I for:
Config::CONFIG["rubyhdrdir"] + "/" + Config::CONFIG["arch"]
Perhaps there's a cleaner way to get the required list of -I options? Just adding them like this feels a bit ad-hoc, but I'm not a Ruby expert.
Anyway, for now try rerunning make like so continue as if we had done this so we can see if there are any further issues:
make INCLUDES=-I`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["rubyhdrdir"] + "/" + Config::CONFIG["arch"]'`
comment:6 by , 16 years ago
I'm getting error:
xapian_wrap.cc:2966:20: error: rubyio.h: No such file or directory
My Ruby installation doesn't have it. Instead it has ruby/io.h.
comment:7 by , 16 years ago
Hmm, there's an impressive lack of consistency between distros here - Ubuntu intrepid has a compatibility header for rubyio.h which just includes ruby/io.h:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3274 2008-01-07 04:49 /usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/ruby/io.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 21 2007-06-10 15:06 /usr/include/ruby-1.9.0/rubyio.h
This header inclusion comes from SWIG and there's machinery in more recent SWIG versions to handle this it seems.
For now, let's try a simpler workaround - from the xapian-bindings-1.0.10 directory:
echo '#include "ruby/io.h"' > ruby/rubyio.h make INCLUDES=-I`ruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["rubyhdrdir"] + "/" + Config::CONFIG["arch"]'`
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | xapian-bindings-1.0.10-make2.log added |
---|
make INCLUDES=-Iruby -rrbconfig -e 'puts Config::CONFIG["rubyhdrdir"] + "/" + Config::CONFIG["arch"]'
comment:8 by , 16 years ago
OK, the first slew are due to a new, and arguably broken, optimisation in ruby.h. Not totally sure what to do about those. I guess just #undef rb_intern
and then GCC uses the same code as other compilers do, and as Ruby 1.8 had.
The last six are easier - I'll commit a fix for those in a moment.
by , 16 years ago
Makefile for extension generated bu Ruby 1.9.1 RC1 itself (using mkmf facilities)
comment:9 by , 16 years ago
The attached Makefile has some bits that you can use to build bindings against ruby 1.9.
comment:10 by , 16 years ago
Fixes committed for the remaining issues to SVN trunk r11938. Needs backporting before 1.0.11.
comment:11 by , 16 years ago
comment:12 by , 16 years ago
With Ruby 1.8, make check
gives me:
Loaded suite ./smoketest Started ................ Finished in 0.096853 seconds. 16 tests, 38 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors PASS: smoketest.rb ============= 1 test passed =============
With Ruby 1.9, make check
gives me:
Loaded suite ./smoketest Started /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:94:in `sub!': can't modify frozen string (RuntimeError) from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:94:in `test_started' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/util/observable.rb:78:in `call' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/util/observable.rb:78:in `block in notify_listeners' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/util/observable.rb:78:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/util/observable.rb:78:in `notify_listeners' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:47:in `block in run_suite' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testcase.rb:72:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `block in run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:34:in `block in run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `each' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/testsuite.rb:33:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/testrunnermediator.rb:46:in `run_suite' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:67:in `start_mediator' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/console/testrunner.rb:41:in `start' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/ui/testrunnerutilities.rb:29:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/autorunner.rb:216:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit/autorunner.rb:12:in `run' from /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.0/test/unit.rb:278:in `block in <top (required)>' FAIL: smoketest.rb ======================================= 1 of 1 test failed Please report to http://xapian.org/bugs =======================================
I'm guessing some change in 1.9 breaks something in smoketest.rb but the backtrace doesn't help me see what. Any ideas?
comment:13 by , 16 years ago
Milestone: | 1.0.11 → 1.1.1 |
---|
Googling for the error message, it seems this may be down to ruby 1.9.0 being a development release:
It's quite possible that the issue is just the test suite and that the bindings work, but even if not, failing to work with a development version of Ruby isn't such a big deal as failing to work with a stable release, so this doesn't need to be fixed for 1.0.x currently, nor block the 1.1.0 development release.
Hence moving to milestone:1.1.1
It would be nice to find out if the problem has been fixed, and if not to report it to the Ruby developers (to make sure this doesn't turn into a failure to work with the next stable release) but I don't have the time to do so right now, so that will probably have to wait until someone with more Ruby skills steps in to help.
comment:14 by , 16 years ago
Sounds like this is the bug in Ruby 1.9.0's "test/unit" and may well be fixed in Ruby 1.9.1:
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/771
If you're easily able to test with 1.9.1, please do report back.
comment:15 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Tested with Ruby 1.9.1, where "make check" passes.
comment:16 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | 1.1.1 → 1.0.11 |
---|
Ruby 1.9 knows where its header located